From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 25, 1982
288 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)

Summary

concluding that defendant's "timely presence at the scene of the crime and the circumstances of his discovery there [provided] sufficient corroboration of the accomplice's testimony"

Summary of this case from Kegler v. State

Opinion

63068.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1982. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 10, 1982.

Burglary. Houston Superior Court. Before Judge Hunt.

Harry J. Fox, Jr., for appellant.

Theron Finlayson, District Attorney, James F. Garnett, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Appellant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence presented against him in his trial for burglary of the Perry School Annex, a building occupied by the Houston County Board of Education. Finding the evidence sufficient to support this conviction, we affirm.

Police officers discovered appellant crouched behind one of the school's air conditioning units. Contrary to appellant's assertion, this is not a case where appellant was convicted solely on evidence of his presence at the scene of a crime (compare Sweat v. State, 119 Ga. App. 646 ( 168 S.E.2d 654)), since another suspect, captured as he fled the school building, testified for the state at appellant's trial and identified appellant as a member of the quartet which broke into the school building. Under Code Ann. § 38-121, the testimony of one witness is generally sufficient to establish a fact except in a felony case where the witness is an accomplice. In such a case, there must be independent corroborative evidence which tends to connect the accused with the crime. Adams v. State, 140 Ga. App. 621 ( 231 S.E.2d 547). Appellant's timely presence at the scene of the crime and the circumstances of his discovery there are sufficient corroboration of the accomplice's testimony and, taking the evidence as a whole, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found appellant guilty of burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560).

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1982 — REHEARING DENIED MARCH 10, 1982.


Summaries of

Solomon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 25, 1982
288 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)

concluding that defendant's "timely presence at the scene of the crime and the circumstances of his discovery there [provided] sufficient corroboration of the accomplice's testimony"

Summary of this case from Kegler v. State
Case details for

Solomon v. State

Case Details

Full title:SOLOMON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 25, 1982

Citations

288 S.E.2d 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
288 S.E.2d 342

Citing Cases

Kegler v. State

The testimony of Shawn Often and the deputies who participated in the execution of the search warrant served…

Gilmore v. State

“Testimony which shows nothing more than the defendant was ... in the company of the accomplice at [even] the…