From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. Negrete

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-02103 WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-02103 WBS-AC

03-04-2013

VINCENTE SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. J. NEGRETE, et al., Defendants.


[Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING

DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE

MOTIONS

Good cause appearing, the motion of Defendants Barajas, Campbell, Franco, Garcia, Lundy, Medrano, Norgaard, Prior, Stallcup, Torres, Vasquez, and Wright to extend the dispositive-motion deadline until after the Court has ruled on Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 109) is granted.

If the Court denies Plaintiff's motion to compel, dispositive motions shall be filed fourteen days after the Court issues the order. If the Court grants Plaintiff's motion to compel, dispositive motions shall be filed no later than thirty days after the responses to the discovery are due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Solomon v. Negrete

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-02103 WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Solomon v. Negrete

Case Details

Full title:VINCENTE SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. J. NEGRETE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-02103 WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)