From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solomon v. City of S. Lake Tahoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 12, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD

02-12-2013

PATRICK WAYNE SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER J. HERMINGHAUS, individually and in his official capacity; COUNTY OF EL DORADO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER BRANDON PENA individually and in his official capacity; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.

CAULFIELD LAW FIRM Andrew T. Caulfield Attorneys for Defendants County of El Dorado, County of El Dorado Sheriff's Department, and Brandon Pina (sued herein as Brandon Pena) THE LAW FIRM OF LAUB & LAUB Jennifer Peterson, Esq. Susan M. Leeder Attorneys for Plaintiff Patrick Wayne Solomon


ANDREW T. CAULFIELD, SBN 238300
RICHARD H. CAULFIELD, SBN 50258
CAULFIELD LAW FIRM
1101 Investment Blvd., Suite 120
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Telephone: (916) 933-3200
Facsimile: (916) 605-4075
andrew@caulfieldlawfirm.com
Attorneys for Defendants County of El Dorado,
County of El Dorado Sheriff's Department,
and Brandon Pina (sued herein as Brandon Pena)

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR EL

DORADO DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND


Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

Plaintiff Patrick Wayne Solomon ("Plaintiff") and Defendants County of El Dorado, County of El Dorado Sheriff's Department, and Brandon Pina (sued herein as Officer Brandon Pena) (collectively, "County Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. WHEREAS, the County of El Dorado has not yet been served in this case. Counsel for the County Defendants has agreed to accept service by mail on behalf of the County of El Dorado. Plaintiff will effectuate service on the County in this manner forthwith.

2. WHEREAS, the Court docket currently identifies February 13, 2013 as the due date for the responsive pleading to be filed by Defendants County of El Dorado Sheriff's Department and Brandon Pina. (See Dckt. No. 8, 9).

3. WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to an extension of time for Defendants County of El Dorado Sheriff‘s Department and Brandon Pina to respond to the Complaint, making those Defendants' responses due at the same time as the response is due from the County of El Dorado.

4. WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the County Defendants must answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before March 6, 2013.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The time within which Defendants County of El Dorado Sheriff's Department and Brandon Pina (sued herein as Officer Brandon Pena) must answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended from February 13, 2013 to March 6, 2013.

2. The County of El Dorado must also answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before March 6, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

CAULFIELD LAW FIRM

By: _____________

Andrew T. Caulfield

Attorneys for Defendants County of El Dorado,

County of El Dorado Sheriff's Department, and

Brandon Pina (sued herein as Brandon Pena)

THE LAW FIRM OF LAUB & LAUB

By: ____________________

Jennifer Peterson, Esq.

Susan M. Leeder

Attorneys for Plaintiff Patrick Wayne Solomon

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

The Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Solomon v. City of S. Lake Tahoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 12, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Solomon v. City of S. Lake Tahoe

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK WAYNE SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; CITY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2013)