From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soloky v. Cooke

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1960
116 S.E.2d 166 (N.C. 1960)

Opinion

Filed 21 September, 1960.

APPEAL by defendants from Morris, J., at April Term, 1960, of WASHINGTON.

Mayo Mayo, Wilkinson Ward for plaintiff, appellee.

Norman Rodman for defendants, appellants.


Civil action to recover property damage resulting form actionable negligence of defendants in a collision between automobile of plaintiff and truck of defendants. The case was submitted to the jury and the jury found for its verdict that plaintiff's automobile was damaged by the negligence of the defendants as alleged in the complaint; that plaintiff did not by his own negligence contribute to his injury and damage; and that plaintiff is entitled to recover of defendants $2,295.00.

Defendants appeal: therefrom for Supreme Court, and assign error.


Upon careful consideration of the evidence shown in the record of case on appeal taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it appears sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, and the verdict is adequate to support the judgment.

The record indicates that the trial was conducted in accordance with law, and error for which the verdict and judgment should be disturbed is not made to appear. Hence in the judgment from which appeal is taken there is

No error.


Summaries of

Soloky v. Cooke

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1960
116 S.E.2d 166 (N.C. 1960)
Case details for

Soloky v. Cooke

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RICHARD SOLOKY v. MARY HOYLE COOKE AND C.T. COOKE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1960

Citations

116 S.E.2d 166 (N.C. 1960)
253 N.C. 62