From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soliz v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Dec 19, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-2775 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-2775

12-19-2019

PETE SOLIZ, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 15), the court is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this court.

The parties filed no objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation. --------

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED by this court.

The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the respective parties.

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 19th day of December, 2019.

/s/_________

SIM LAKE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Soliz v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Dec 19, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-2775 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Soliz v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:PETE SOLIZ, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-18-2775 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2019)

Citing Cases

Vadney v. Saul

(Tr. 27.) Courts have held that similar explanations satisfied the ALJ's duty. See, e.g., Kessans v. Comm'r…