From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soler v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 11, 2005
Case No. 3:03cv515/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 3:03cv515/RV/EMT.

October 11, 2005


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated July 26, 2005. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the petitioner's objections (docs. 86, 95).

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

(1) The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

(2) The second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 63) is DENIED.

(3) The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Soler v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 11, 2005
Case No. 3:03cv515/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2005)
Case details for

Soler v. Bauknecht

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTO SOLER, Petitioner, v. DONALD BAUKNECHT, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Oct 11, 2005

Citations

Case No. 3:03cv515/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2005)