From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solarzano v. Power Test Petro, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1992
181 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 31, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Philip C. Modesto, J.).


The trial court properly set aside the verdict and dismissed the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case of serious injury, as required by Insurance Law § 5104 (a). Hospital records pertaining to the treatment plaintiff received immediately after the accident and other medical and hospital records over a course of nearly five years do not show any objective medical proof that he sustained a serious injury. Plaintiff's medical expert's conclusory opinion that plaintiff was suffering from "post concussion syndrome with diffuse cerebral dysfunction" was based upon subjective complaints of occasional and recurrent headaches some five years after the accident, not upon objective medical findings so as to establish serious injury (see, O'Neill v Rogers, 163 A.D.2d 466).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Solarzano v. Power Test Petro, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1992
181 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Solarzano v. Power Test Petro, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARCIAL SOLARZANO, Appellant, v. POWER TEST PETRO, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Tully v. Kenmore-Tonawanda Union Free School Dist.

The burden thus shifted to plaintiff, who failed to submit objective proof of a permanent consequential…

Munoz v. Robinson

Defendants also met their prima facie burden as to Plaintiff's alleged head injury through Dr. April's…