From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co.

New York Superior Court — General Term
Jan 1, 1895
11 Misc. 715 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)

Opinion

January, 1895.

Davies, Short Townsend ( Edward W. Thomas, of counsel), for appellant.

John L. Brower, for respondent.


The judgment and order are affirmed, with costs, on the opinion filed by MCADAM, J., the learned trial judge, upon the denial of the motion for a new trial.

Present: FREEDMAN and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co.

New York Superior Court — General Term
Jan 1, 1895
11 Misc. 715 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)
Case details for

Solarz v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SOLARZ, Respondent, v . THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY CO. Appellant

Court:New York Superior Court — General Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1895

Citations

11 Misc. 715 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)