From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sokolowski v. Chafetz

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 2, 2017
No. 72299 (Nev. Jun. 2, 2017)

Opinion

No. 72299

06-02-2017

WILLIAM A. SOKOLOWSKI; AND CURTIS W. ACTION, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP., Appellants, v. IRWIN CHAFETZ; CHARLES D. FORMAN; IRWIN A. SIEGEL; PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP; FREDERICK HIPWELL; AND LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP., Respondents.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Certain parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal. Because the stipulation is not signed on behalf of all respondents it is treated and granted as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT

ELIZABETH A. BROWN

BY: /s/_________ cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge

Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge

Albright Stoddard Warnick & Albright

Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz

Greenfield & Goodman, LLC

DLA Piper LLP/San Diego

Latham & Watkins LLP

Santoro Whitmire

DLA Piper LLP/Chicago

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas

Morris Law Group

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Sokolowski v. Chafetz

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 2, 2017
No. 72299 (Nev. Jun. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Sokolowski v. Chafetz

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. SOKOLOWSKI; AND CURTIS W. ACTION, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF LAS…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 2, 2017

Citations

No. 72299 (Nev. Jun. 2, 2017)