From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sogg v. Goodman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 17, 2011
949 N.E.2d 14 (Ohio 2011)

Opinion

No. 2011-0328.

June 17, 2011.

Franklin App. No. 10AP-358, 2011-Ohio-81.


Motion and Procedural Rulings.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of appellant's motion for reconsideration.

Upon review of the notice of appeal, memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and motion for reconsideration, it is evident that John R. Wylie, Charles R. Watkins, Arthur T. Susman, and Glenn L. Hara have not filed timely motions for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.Ct.Prac. R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that John R. Wylie, Charles R. Watkins, Arthur T. Susman, and Glenn L. Hara are stricken from the notice of appeal, memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and motion for reconsideration for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prac. R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar R. XII (2)(A)(6)(a)-(e).


Summaries of

Sogg v. Goodman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 17, 2011
949 N.E.2d 14 (Ohio 2011)
Case details for

Sogg v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:Sogg v. Goodman

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 17, 2011

Citations

949 N.E.2d 14 (Ohio 2011)
949 N.E.2d 14
2011 Ohio 2940