Soderstrom v. Orange County District Attorney

Full title: RANDY LEE SODERSTROM, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 12, 2009

SACV 08-00309 PA (SS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2009)

Opinion

RANDY LEE SODERSTROM, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al., Defendants. No. SACV 08-00309 PA (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 12, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all of the records and files herein, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Plaintiff's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action in its entirety with prejudice.

         2. All pending motions in this action are terminated.

         3. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Plaintiff and on counsel for Defendants.