From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. New York City Tr. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2003
2 A.D.3d 162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2389.

December 4, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered September 10, 2002, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Ephrem Wertenteil, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lawrence Heisler, for Defendant-Respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin, JJ.


Defendant did not have a duty to warn plaintiff of the danger of leaning over the subway platform in such a manner as to place his body in the path of an oncoming train. Under the circumstances, plaintiff's injury was attributable solely to his own reckless conduct ( see Feng v. Metro. Tr. Auth., 285 A.D.2d 447, 448; Brown v. Metro. Tr. Auth., 281 A.D.2d 159, 160-161).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Snyder v. New York City Tr. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2003
2 A.D.3d 162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Snyder v. New York City Tr. Auth

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SNYDER, ETC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 4, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 620

Citing Cases

Soto v. New York City Transit Authority

" In Merino v. New York City Tr. Auth. ( 89 NY2d 824, 825) we refused recovery to a plaintiff who had fallen…