From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. Blinder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 1996
230 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

August 5, 1996


In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated August 28, 1995, which denied his motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) for failure to timely serve a complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant's motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) is granted, and the action is dismissed.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) to dismiss the action based on the plaintiff's failure to timely serve a complaint. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her delay, and the affidavit of merit submitted to the court failed to establish that she has a meritorious cause of action (see, Gibson v Victory Mem. Hosp., 221 A.D.2d 503; CPLR 3012 [d]). O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Snyder v. Blinder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 1996
230 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Snyder v. Blinder

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY SNYDER, Respondent, v. TODD M. BLINDER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 5, 1996

Citations

230 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 299

Citing Cases

Elbaz v. Lieb

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR…

Dunefsky v. Petco Animal Supplies Inc.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the appellant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3012(b) to dismiss the action. The…