From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snyder v. Becerra

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 24, 2021
20-2073 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2021)

Opinion

20-2073

11-24-2021

MICHAEL SNYDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.

David A. Branch, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH &ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Jonathan F. Lenzner, Acting United States Attorney, Alan C. Lazerow, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 7, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:18-cv-00511-TDC)

David A. Branch, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH &ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Jonathan F. Lenzner, Acting United States Attorney, Alan C. Lazerow, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Snyder appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services on Snyder's discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; and on his age discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Snyder v. Azar, No. 8:18-cv-00511-TDC (D. Md. filed Aug. 10, 2020 &entered Aug. 11, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Snyder v. Becerra

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 24, 2021
20-2073 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Snyder v. Becerra

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SNYDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. XAVIER BECERRA, in his official…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

20-2073 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2021)

Citing Cases

Wiggins v. Balt. Police Dep't

In contrast, placing an employee on leave without pay could be an adverse action. See, e.g., Snyder v. Azar,…

Johnson v. Balt. Police Dep't

In contrast, placing an employee on leave without pay could be an adverse action. See, e.g., Snyder v. Azar,…