From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snow v. Align Tech.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 1, 2023
21-cv-03269-VC (TSH) (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-03269-VC (TSH)

05-01-2023

MISTY SNOW, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.


DISCOVERY ORDER

RE: DKT. NO. 352

THOMAS S. HIXSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In ECF No. 339, the Court ruled that certain categories of redactions made by SDC to materials from the multiple Align-SDC arbitrations were improper. Because the Court ruled on categories of documents, it ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding the application of the order to specific documents. If they were not able to reach an agreement, the Court ordered them to file a joint discovery letter brief by today. They have done so. ECF No. 352. Happily, there is only one document in dispute, and in it only five disputed redactions. The Court agrees with SDC's suggestion for in camera review. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Align to email SDCSNOW00009573, with the challenged redacted material highlighted to facilitate review, to TSHpo@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 12:00 p.m. on May 2, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Snow v. Align Tech.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 1, 2023
21-cv-03269-VC (TSH) (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Snow v. Align Tech.

Case Details

Full title:MISTY SNOW, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 1, 2023

Citations

21-cv-03269-VC (TSH) (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2023)