From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Snitchfield v. Red Bluff Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2013
No. 2:10-CV-3243-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-CV-3243-LKK-CMK

01-07-2013

ROGER P. SNITCHFIELD, Plaintiff, v. RED BLUFF POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. No opposition to the pending motion has been filed. Therefore, pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c), the hearing scheduled for January 9, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California, is hereby taken off calendar and the matter is submitted on the record and briefs without oral argument.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Snitchfield v. Red Bluff Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2013
No. 2:10-CV-3243-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Snitchfield v. Red Bluff Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:ROGER P. SNITCHFIELD, Plaintiff, v. RED BLUFF POLICE DEPT., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 7, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-CV-3243-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2013)