Snider v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Full title: VALORIE SNIDER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 9, 2018

Case No. 3:16-cv-02236-JR (D. Or. Mar. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:16-cv-02236-JR

03-09-2018

VALORIE SNIDER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

AIKEN, District Judge

ORDER

:

Magistrate Judge Jolie Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") on 1/08/2018 (doc. 29) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir, 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Plaintiff filed timely objections to the F&R (doc. 34), and the Commissioner has filed a response to those objections (doc. 35). Thus, I review the F&R de novo.

Having reviewed the record and the F&R de novo, I find no error in Judge Russo's reasoning.

Thus, I adopt Magistrate Judge Russo's F&R (doc. 29) in its entirety. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the F&R and this order. This case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 9^th day of March, 2018.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken

United States District Judge