Opinion
No. 05-04-01393-CR
Opinion Filed September 23, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F02-23079-Rnu. Affirm.
Before Justices FITZGERALD, LANG-MIERS, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Corey Overton Sneed entered a negotiated guilty plea to burglary of a habitation. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on three years' community supervision, and assessed a $2000 fine. The State later moved to adjudicate appellant's guilt, asserting appellant violated several conditions of his supervision. Appellant pleaded true to the allegations. The judge adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced appellant to ten years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.