From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sneed v. Faulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 14, 2016
No. 2:14-cv-2478 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-2478 GEB KJN P

12-14-2016

DONNIE KAY SNEED, Plaintiff, v. FRED FAULK, Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed November 7, 2016, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. On November 7, 2016, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: December 14, 2016

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE /snee2478.fta.ext


Summaries of

Sneed v. Faulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 14, 2016
No. 2:14-cv-2478 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Sneed v. Faulk

Case Details

Full title:DONNIE KAY SNEED, Plaintiff, v. FRED FAULK, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 14, 2016

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-2478 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2016)