From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smithey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 15, 2016
206 So. 3d 717 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 5D15–772.

11-15-2016

Anita Jane SMITHEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

William R. Ponall, of Ponall Law, Maitland, Whitney S. Boan, of Whitney S. Boan, P.A., Orlando, and Michael J. Snure, of Michael J. Snure, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


William R. Ponall, of Ponall Law, Maitland, Whitney S. Boan, of Whitney S. Boan, P.A., Orlando, and Michael J. Snure, of Michael J. Snure, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., and ORFINGER, M., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Smithey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 15, 2016
206 So. 3d 717 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Smithey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anita Jane SMITHEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Nov 15, 2016

Citations

206 So. 3d 717 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Smithey v. State

On direct appeal, her conviction was affirmed per curiam. Smithey v. State, 206 So. 3d 717 (Fla. 5th DCA…