From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 27, 2009
No. 09-09-00327-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-09-00327-CV

Opinion Delivered August 27, 2009.

On Appeal from the 411th District Court Polk County Texas, Trial Cause No. CIV24,101.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


James Charles Smith filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's order denying Smith to intervene in a suit filed by Charles Ray Mason. Smith, an inmate confined in the Polunsky Unit, resides in the county of the suit. An order dismissing or striking a petition in intervention may not be appealed by the intervenor before rendition of a final judgment. Metromedia Long Distance, Inc. v. Hughes, 810 S.W.2d 494, 499 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1991, writ denied). Smith has not identified a statute that authorizes an interlocutory appeal under these circumstances. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

The trial court initially dismissed all claims by all parties. We affirmed the trial court's dismissal without prejudice of the intervention filed by Smith but reversed the dismissal with prejudice of Mason's claims and remanded the case to the trial court. See Mason v. Wood, 282 S.W.3d 189, 191 (Tex. App.-Beaumont Mar. 19, 2009, no pet.). Smith then filed another motion asking for leave to intervene. The trial court signed two somewhat contradictory orders in the same day. Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we do not determine Smith's status as a party.

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 27, 2009
No. 09-09-00327-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CHARLES SMITH, Appellant v. ARTHUR J. WOOD, ET AL., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Aug 27, 2009

Citations

No. 09-09-00327-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 27, 2009)