From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Williams

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 4, 2021
317 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-2297

06-04-2021

Quandarius SMITH, Appellant, v. Staci WILLIAMS and Alexis Amoy Bailey, Appellees.

Quandarius Smith, Lawrenceville, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Quandarius Smith, Lawrenceville, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The father, Quandarius Smith, appeals an order denying his motion for contempt brought against the minor child's temporary custodian, Staci Williams, for alleged interference with visitation. Because the father has not provided this Court with the necessary transcript of the proceedings below, we are precluded from addressing whether the trial court's order was without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). We must affirm unless the father can demonstrate that "fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order." Murphy v. Murphy , 948 So. 2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The father has made no such showing in this case.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Williams

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 4, 2021
317 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:QUANDARIUS SMITH, Appellant, v. STACI WILLIAMS AND ALEXIS AMOY BAILEY…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 4, 2021

Citations

317 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)