From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 2, 2023
1:19-cv-298 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2023)

Opinion

1:19-cv-298

03-02-2023

MUARICE SMITH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


Karen L. Litkovitz, Magistrate Judge.

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 43)

MATTHEW W. McFARLAND, JUDGE.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 43), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following:

1. Petitioner's motions to reinstate this matter (Docs. 36, 39, 41) are GRANTED;

2. The October 23, 2020 Order administratively staying this action and terminating this case on the Court's active docket (Docs. 30, 31) is VACATED;

3. This matter is REINSTATED to this Court's active docket;

4. Petitioner SHALL FILE a supplement to his Petition within 30 days of this Order;

5. Respondent SHALL FILE a supplement to the State Court Record and Supplemental Return of Writ within 60 days of Petitioner's supplement to his Petition;

6. Petitioner MAY FILE a Traverse/Reply within 21 days of Respondent's Supplemental Return of Writ.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 2, 2023
1:19-cv-298 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:MUARICE SMITH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 2, 2023

Citations

1:19-cv-298 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2023)