From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 13, 2015
Case No. 3:13-cv-330 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-330

01-13-2015

SHELDON SMITH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Respondent.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND EVIDENTIARY HEARING

This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment and Request for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. No. 51).

Petitioner notes that, on his Motion, the Court ordered expansion of the record and allowed Respondent time from Petitioner's filing of a supplemental memorandum in support of his motion to amend to file a memorandum in opposition (Doc. No. 32, PageID 1181). Petitioner in fact filed his Memorandum in Support of Motion to Amend on November 26, 2014 (Doc. No. 40). Under S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.2, Respondent's time to file a memorandum thus expired on December 22, 2014. Petitioner calculates the date as December 18, 2014 (Motion, Doc. No. 51, PageID 1339), but that does not accord Respondent the extra three days allowed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Respondent filed no memorandum by the later date and the Magistrate Judge proceeded to file a Supplemental Report and Recommendations on December 24, 2014 (Doc. No. 47).

S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 55 has no application to these circumstances. By not filing an additional memorandum within the time allowed, Respondent merely forfeited his right to brief the issues further and not the whole case. For the reasons set forth in the Supplemental Report and Recommendations and Second the Supplemental Report and Recommendations, Petitioner is not entitled to habeas corpus relief in this case.

The Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. January 13, 2015.

s/ Michael R. Merz

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 13, 2015
Case No. 3:13-cv-330 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:SHELDON SMITH, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jan 13, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-330 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2015)