From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Wang

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 4, 2011
452 F. App'x 292 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6291

11-04-2011

JOHNATHAN LEE SMITH, a/k/a Johnathan Lee X Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LAWRENCE WANG, M.D.; VCU HEALTH SYSTEM; MCV HOSPITALS AND PHYSICIANS; MICHAEL C. KURZ, M.D.; DEBORAH KLEIMAN; DHIREN E. KUMAR, M.D.; JENNY O. SMITH, M.D.; VELMIR A. LUKETIC, M.D.; SUBHASH A. NANIWADEKAR, M.D., Defendants - Appellees.

Johnathan Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Michael Rainsbury, Nancy Fuller Reynolds, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00462-sgw-mfu)

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnathan Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Michael Rainsbury, Nancy Fuller Reynolds, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Johnathan Lee Smith appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, finding he was not in imminent danger of serious physical injury, denying his application to proceed under the PLRA without prepayment of the filing fees and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Wang, No. 7:09-cv-00462-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va., Jan. 31, 2011). Because the Defendants challenged Smith's assertion that he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury, for the purpose of seeking leave to proceed under the PLRA without prepayment of fees, there was no error in the magistrate judge's decision to have an evidentiary hearing on the issue. See Taylor v. Watkins, 623 F.3d 483, 485 (7th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Smith v. Wang

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 4, 2011
452 F. App'x 292 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. Wang

Case Details

Full title:JOHNATHAN LEE SMITH, a/k/a Johnathan Lee X Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

452 F. App'x 292 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Shepherd v. Annucci

All of our sister circuits to have confronted this question have held that district courts – upon challenge…

Pinder v. WellPath, LLC

[and] may consider materials outside of the complaint in conducting this limited inquiry." Shepherd v.…