From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Vill. of Woodlawn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
Case Number: 1:11cv897 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:11cv897

04-15-2013

Grace Smith, Plaintiff(s) v. Village of Woodlawn, Defendant(s)


Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott


ORDER

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action (including all claims by all parties) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown not later than May 15, 2013, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement upon approval of the Court. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce a settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v Guardian Life Ins. Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

This Court explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached by the parties.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

Susan J. Dlott

Chief United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Vill. of Woodlawn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
Case Number: 1:11cv897 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Vill. of Woodlawn

Case Details

Full title:Grace Smith, Plaintiff(s) v. Village of Woodlawn, Defendant(s)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

Case Number: 1:11cv897 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2013)