From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. U.S. Dep't of Transp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Dec 4, 2018
Case No. 6:16-cv-1875-TC (D. Or. Dec. 4, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 6:16-cv-1875-TC

12-04-2018

STEVEN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 61), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the report. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 61) is adopted in full. Plaintiff's motion for additional discovery (ECF No. 54) is DENIED. DOT's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 48) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 4th day of December, 2018.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. U.S. Dep't of Transp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Dec 4, 2018
Case No. 6:16-cv-1875-TC (D. Or. Dec. 4, 2018)
Case details for

Smith v. U.S. Dep't of Transp.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and U.S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Dec 4, 2018

Citations

Case No. 6:16-cv-1875-TC (D. Or. Dec. 4, 2018)