Opinion
No. 5:17-HC-2012-D
12-21-2017
ORDER
On October 20, 2017, Magistrate Judge Numbers issued a Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") [D.E. 5] and recommended that the court dismiss Jamone Smith's ("Smith") 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. No party objected to the M&R.
"The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to make a de novo determination of those portions of the magistrate judge's report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (emphasis, alteration, and quotation omitted); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Absent a timely objection, "a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond, 416 F.3d at 315 (quotation omitted).
The court has reviewed the M&R, the record, and Smith's petition. The court is satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 5]. Smith's petition is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the court DENIES a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000). The clerk shall close the case.
SO ORDERED. This 21 day of December 2017.
/s/_________
JAMES C. DEVER III
Chief United States District Judge