From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
May 20, 2019
Civil Action No. 2:18-1522-RMG (D.S.C. May. 20, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:18-1522-RMG

05-20-2019

Mark Smith, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant.


ORDER AND OPINION

The Court, having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled,

IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. If settlement is not consummated within sixty (60) days, either party may petition the Court to reopen this action and restore it to the calendar. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). In the alternative, to the extent permitted by law, either party may within sixty (60) days petition the Court to enforce the settlement, and the Court specifically retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. See Fairfax Countywide Citizens v. Fairfax Cnty., 571 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1978). The dismissal hereunder shall be with prejudice if no action is taken under either alternative within sixty (60) days from the filing date of this order.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Richard Mark Gergel

Richard Mark Gergel

United States District Court Judge May 20, 2019
Charleston, South Carolina


Summaries of

Smith v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
May 20, 2019
Civil Action No. 2:18-1522-RMG (D.S.C. May. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Smith v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Mark Smith, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: May 20, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:18-1522-RMG (D.S.C. May. 20, 2019)