From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation Dist.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Sep 29, 2022
20-cv-00345-MK (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2022)

Opinion

20-cv-00345-MK

09-29-2022

MATTHEW JAMES SMITH; PAUL CALLEN; DARREN PARKER; LYNN WARNER; KATHY POWELL; ANN CORKERY; ALLAN D. CLACK; KEVIN CORKERY; and JBC v. TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT; RONALD ALVARADO; and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, Defendants.


ORDER

Michael McShane, United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 92), and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiffs' objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 92) is adopted in full. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 67) is DENIED and Defendant Tumalo Irrigation District's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 69) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation Dist.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Sep 29, 2022
20-cv-00345-MK (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Tumalo Irrigation Dist.

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW JAMES SMITH; PAUL CALLEN; DARREN PARKER; LYNN WARNER; KATHY…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Sep 29, 2022

Citations

20-cv-00345-MK (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2022)