From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Tishman

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 6, 2021
21-CV-2915 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-2915 (PGG)

07-06-2021

STEWART M. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AECOM TISHMAN; TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION; ROBERT HOLT a.k.a. Robert Randolph Holt, Randy Holt; MARK ANTHONY FLEMING; HAROLD BLAKE, Defendants.


ORDER OF SERVICE

PAUL G. GARDEPHE, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the relevant fees to commence this action.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses as to Defendants AECOM Tishman, Tishman Construction Corporation, Robert Holt (also known as Robert Randolph Holt and Randy Holt), Mark Anthony Fleming, and Harold Blake. Plaintiff is directed to serve a summons and the complaint on each defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summonses. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served the defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against the defendants under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Tishman

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 6, 2021
21-CV-2915 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Tishman

Case Details

Full title:STEWART M. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AECOM TISHMAN; TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

21-CV-2915 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2021)