From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Thorpe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Nov 30, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV673-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17CV673-HEH

11-30-2017

ANTONIO DARRELL SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MS. THORPE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on October 26, 2017, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. (ECF No. 3.) The Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

By failing to return a consent to collection of fees form, Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: November 30, 2017
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Smith v. Thorpe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Nov 30, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV673-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Smith v. Thorpe

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO DARRELL SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MS. THORPE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17CV673-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2017)