From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 15, 2015
15-CV-0712A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2015)

Opinion

15-CV-0712A

09-15-2015

RIAN T. SMITH, Petitioner, v. JAMES THOMPSON, Superintendent of Collins Corr. Fac., Respondent.


DECISION and ORDER

Petitioner Rian T. Smith, acting pro se, is a prisoner housed at Collins Correctional Facility. Petitioner seeks relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that his conviction in Niagara County Court, State of New York, was unconstitutionally obtained, as set forth more precisely in the petition. Petitioner has paid the $5.00 filing fee.

The Court notes that petitioner previously filed a petition in this Court seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition was dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies. See Smith v. Graham, 13-CV-0349A. The instant petition is deemed not to be a successive petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a). See Vasquez v. Parrott, 318 F.3d 387, 390 (2d Cir. 2003)(internal quotation marks and citations omitted) ("where a first petition is dismissed for technical procedural reasons, such as failure to exhaust state remedies, a refiling of that petition after complying with the required formalities does not count as second or successive."). Accordingly,

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition, in accordance with Rules 4 and 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, no later than ninety (90) days from entry of this Order. Further, the answer shall state whether a trial or any pre-trial or post-trial evidentiary proceeding was conducted. If any such proceeding was conducted, under the authority of Rule 4, the Court hereby directs respondent to provide to the Court the transcript of the proceeding, together with any record(s) of, and documents relating to, such proceeding, and such documents will be filed in the official record of this case.

Respondent also shall file and serve by the above date a memorandum of law addressing each of the issues raised in the petition and including citations of relevant supporting authority.

Within thirty (30) days of the date this order is served upon the custodian of the records, the Clerk of Court or any other official having custody of the records of the proceedings in County Court at issue now before this Court shall submit such records to respondent or the respondent's duly authorized representative.

If petitioner appealed from the judgment of conviction or from an adverse judgment or order in a post-conviction proceeding, under the authority of Rule 4, the Court hereby directs respondent to provide to the Court a copy of the briefs and record on appeal and the opinions of the appellate courts, if any, and such documents will be filed in the official record of this case.

Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days upon receipt of the answer to file a written response to the answer and memorandum of law.

Within thirty (30) days of the date this order is filed with the Clerk of Court, respondent may file a motion for a more definite statement or a motion to dismiss the petition, accompanied by appropriate exhibits which demonstrate that an answer to the petition is unnecessary. The timely filing of such motion shall extend the time for filing an answer for fourteen (14) days, but the failure of the Court to act upon the motion within that time shall not further extend the time for filing an answer.

2. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the petition, together with a copy of this order, electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to Alyson Gill <Alyson.Gill@ag.ny.gov> and Arlene.Roces@ag.ny.gov> of the Office of the Attorney General, Federal Habeas Unit.

PETITIONER MUST FORWARD A COPY OF ALL FUTURE PAPERS AND CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ATTORNEY APPEARING FOR RESPONDENT.

SO ORDERED Dated: 09/15, 2015

Buffalo, New York

/s/_________

WILLIAM M. SKRETNY

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 15, 2015
15-CV-0712A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:RIAN T. SMITH, Petitioner, v. JAMES THOMPSON, Superintendent of Collins…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 15, 2015

Citations

15-CV-0712A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2015)