Opinion
No. ED 103172
08-23-2016
James Antonio SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Timothy Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Nathan J. Aquino, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Timothy Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Nathan J. Aquino, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Antonio Smith appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).