From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 2, 2016
184 So. 3d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5421.

02-02-2016

Mulus G. SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Mulus G. Smith, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Mulus G. Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below.

ROWE, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 2, 2016
184 So. 3d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:MULUS G. SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 2, 2016

Citations

184 So. 3d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)