From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Appellate Session of the Superior Court
Feb 4, 1983
458 A.2d 1163 (Conn. App. Ct. 1983)

Opinion

FILE NO. 1290

Argued October 19, 1982 —

Decided February 4, 1983

Appeal by the plaintiff from the finding and award by the workers' compensation commissioner for the second district, brought to the compensation review division; from the decision dismissing the appeal, the plaintiff has appealed to this court. Error; further proceedings.

Howard A. Baran, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Robert G. Girard, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (state).


The plaintiff brought this appeal from the dismissal by the compensation review division of his appeal petition from a finding and award of the workers' compensation commissioner for the second district. The relevant facts in this case are as follows: On August 23, 1979, the plaintiff, an employee of the state, was injured while driving an employer-owned vehicle during the course of his employment. The plaintiff submitted a claim for workers compensation benefits. At the hearing on this claim, expert testimony was offered to establish that the plaintiff suffered significant scarring, a total loss of his reproductive system and spleen, a permanent partial loss of his nervous system, musculature system, excretory system and dermal system and was left a paraplegic.

The workers' compensation commissioner for the second district found that the plaintiff was permanently disabled by virtue of his paraplegia and awarded him benefits under General Statutes 31-307 which authorizes compensation for total incapacity. The commissioner did not make a finding or an award for benefits under General Statutes 31-308 (d) which provides compensation for permanent disfigurement and for loss of organ functions, nor did he take up the issue of whether 31-308 (d) benefits were available in this case.

General Statutes 31-307 provides in pertinent part: "The following — described injuries of any person shall be considered as causing total incapacity and compensation shall be paid accordingly: . . . (e)any injury resulting in permanent and complete paralysis of the legs or arms or of one leg and one arm . .

General Statutes 31-308 (d) provides: "In addition to compensation for total or partial incapacity or for a specific loss of a member or use of the function of a member of the body, the commissioner may award such compensation as he deems just . . . for any permanent significant disfigurement of, or permanent significant scar on, any part of the body . . . . In addition to compensation for total or partial incapacity for specific loss of a member or loss of use of the function of a member of the body or for disfigurement or scarring, the commissioner may award such compensation as he deems just for the loss or loss of use of the function of any organ or part of the body not otherwise provided for herein . . . ."

The plaintiff claims on appeal that the commissioner erred in failing to award him additional benefits under 31-308 (d). The compensation review division rejected this claim, stating that compensation under 31-308 (d) can only be awarded consecutively to benefits ordered under 31-307. The review division therefore concluded that the commissioner properly awarded benefits pursuant to 31-307 only.

The silence of the commissioner on the issue of 31-308 benefits, however, precludes us from determining the merits of the plaintiff's claim. The compensation review division's authority in rendering a decision is limited to "affirming, modifying or reversing the decision of the commissioner." General Statutes 31-301. The commissioner made no finding regarding the evidence submitted to establish that the plaintiff had sustained injuries compensable under 31-308 (d). Lacking a decision by the commissioner on the applicability of 31-308 (d) to the plaintiff's claim for compensation, the review division could only speculate as to the reason why the commissioner failed to award the plaintiff compensation under 31-308 (d). We therefore find that the review division's affirmation and adoption of the commissioner's finding and award is unfounded, absent an articulation by the commissioner on this issue.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Appellate Session of the Superior Court
Feb 4, 1983
458 A.2d 1163 (Conn. App. Ct. 1983)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS P. SMITH, JR. v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT

Court:Appellate Session of the Superior Court

Date published: Feb 4, 1983

Citations

458 A.2d 1163 (Conn. App. Ct. 1983)
458 A.2d 1163

Citing Cases

Smith v. State, Dept. of Environmental Protection

The Commissioner below had awarded total disability payments to the claimant, however the claimant had…

Plourde v. Scovill Manufacturing Co.

His claim for simultaneous payment of permanent partial incapacity payments under Sec. 31-308(d), C.G.S. and…