From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 5, 1926
246 P. 649 (Okla. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

No. A-5605.

Opinion Filed June 5, 1926.

(Syllabus.)

Intoxicating Liquors — Evidence not Sustaining Conviction for Keeping Place Where Liquor Was Sold. The evidence examined, and held clearly insufficient to support the verdict.

Appeal from County Court, Payne County; L.H. Woodyard, Judge.

O.J. Smith was convicted of keeping a place where liquor was sold, and he appeals. Reversed.

John P. Hickam, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.


O.J. Smith, plaintiff in error, defendant in the court below, was charged with keeping a place on Boston avenue, in Yale, Payne county, where whisky was kept, sold, and distributed contrary to law. At the trial he was adjudged guilty, with his punishment assessed at a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for 90 days.

Ten witnesses testified for the state. All of them knew about a little green house, variously located on Boston avenue, West Chicago avenue, or the Albert Pike highway, in or near Yale, said to be occupied by Smith and his wife. None of the witnesses knew positively of any improper conduct there. One witness only said this house had a reputation of being a place where intoxicating liquor was kept for sale. Another witness testified that she saw a negro stop there and later saw him with a bottle of whisky, which she assumed he procured there. The testimony of the other state's witnesses did not tend to support the charge, but, on the contrary, indicated that the defendant was a well-behaved laborer in the oil fields near Yale.

The defendant testified in his own behalf, and twelve other witnesses, including neighbors and fellow employes, testified that they visited at the defendant's home, and know of his employment at different places, but never knew of his being implicated in the sale of whisky, and that his residence was not a place of public resort.

The evidence is clearly insufficient to support the verdict, and the judgment of the trial court is therefore reversed.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 5, 1926
246 P. 649 (Okla. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:O.J. SMITH v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 5, 1926

Citations

246 P. 649 (Okla. Crim. App. 1926)
246 P. 649