From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 26, 2007
967 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 5D07-1168.

October 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Charles M. Holcomb, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


In this appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm appellant's convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the trial court enter a written order finding defendant competent to proceed, nunc pro tunc to the date that the trial court made its oral finding of competency. See Molina v. State, 946 So.2d 1103, 1105 n. 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 26, 2007
967 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 26, 2007

Citations

967 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

We disagree, as we do not believe Smith's sentence amounts to a life sentence or that Graham is controlling.…

Goode v. State

Therefore, we affirm Goode's judgment and sentence but remand for entry of a nunc pro tunc written competency…