From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 27, 1991
590 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-02483.

December 27, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; James R. Thompson, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cecilia A. Traina, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Avi J. Litwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Simon Smith appeals from his conviction and sentence for robbery. He raises two points on appeal. We find merit in his second argument that the trial court improperly included in the order of restitution the lost wages of the victim. The amount of restitution a probationer is required to pay the victim of a crime cannot exceed the amount of damages or loss caused directly or indirectly by a defendant's offense. Fresneda v. State, 347 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1977); Morel v. State, 547 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

We affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence, but reverse and set aside the order of restitution and remand for proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 27, 1991
590 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:SIMON SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 27, 1991

Citations

590 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Powell v. State

Therefore, the portions of the restitution order relating to items Mansingh was not charged with stealing…