From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 17, 1991
578 So. 2d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-1562.

April 17, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Charles E. Smith, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse the defendant's convictions and sentence and remand for a new trial.

The state having opened the door by presenting testimony on the issue of whether the victim and a third party lived together, the trial court erred in not providing the defendant with the opportunity to refute that evidence. We find the error to be harmful.

Because of the new trial, on remand, we point out to the trial court that the defendant cannot be convicted of both sexual battery and lewd assault in this case; that the defendant must be present at any sentencing, should he be convicted again; and that he is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to the imposition of public defender fees and court costs.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 17, 1991
578 So. 2d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN ALLISON SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 17, 1991

Citations

578 So. 2d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)