From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 7, 2008
987 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 5D08-682.

June 20, 2008. Rehearing Denied August 7, 2008.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, David B. Eddy, Judge.

Travis Smith, Blountstown, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Travis Smith appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm in part, but reverse and remand for reconsideration of two claims raised in Smith's January 8, 2008 amended motion. The trial court denied Smith's motion to amend as part of its order denying relief. However, Smith's motion to amend was timely because it was filed before the trial court ruled on the original motion, and within two years from the date the mandate in his direct appeal was issued, May 25, 2007. Postconviction motions under rule 3.850 may be amended or supplemented at any time within the two-year time limit as long as the trial court has not yet ruled on the merits of the motion. Gaskin v. State, 737 So.2d 509, 517-18 (Fla. 1999); Oxendine v. State, 824 So.2d 1022, 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Samuels v. State, 973 So.2d 662, 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY, and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 7, 2008
987 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Travis D. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 7, 2008

Citations

987 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

Travis Smith appeals the trial court's order denying a motion for leave to amend his rule 3.850 motion.…

Harris v. State

Our courts have consistently ruled that a defendant is entitled to have the trial court rule on an amended…