From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 24, 1986
510 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 84-2006.

December 24, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Patricia W. Cocalis, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Michael W. Baker and Joan Fowler Rossin, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

OPINION ON REMAND

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We believe the state has demonstrated that the error in receiving testimony concerning appellant's constitutional right to remain silent was harmless under the test set out in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 24, 1986
510 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 24, 1986

Citations

510 So. 2d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)