From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 26, 1990
555 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-02314.

January 26, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; James S. Parker, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Michele Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant Edith Smith brings two separate errors to our attention. First, her two convictions and sentences for possession of marijuana must be vacated. In each instance it is undisputed that these involved the same undivided quantity of marijuana as did the two sale charges. Gordon v. State, 528 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Dukes v. State, 528 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Second, court costs were assessed without prior notice, thus requiring us to strike this provision of the judgment and sentence. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1989).

The judgments and sentences for sale of marijuana are affirmed.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 26, 1990
555 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDITH C. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 26, 1990

Citations

555 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)