From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Jul 12, 2022
652 S.W.3d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 109780

07-12-2022

Savion SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Abraham P. Copi, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Austin C. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: Abraham P. Copi, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Austin C. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Angela T. Quigless, J. and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM Savion Smith ("Movant") appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In his sole Point on appeal, Movant argues the motion court clearly erred finding Movant's trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to a jury instruction he contends deprived him of his right to a unanimous jury verdict.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Jul 12, 2022
652 S.W.3d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Savion SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Jul 12, 2022

Citations

652 S.W.3d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)