From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 30, 2021
321 So. 3d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1925

06-30-2021

Ernest Judge SMITH III, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Ernest Judge Smith III, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Ernest Judge Smith III, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

Osterhaus, Winokur, and Long, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 30, 2021
321 So. 3d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ernest Judge SMITH III, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

321 So. 3d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)