From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
Aug 14, 2020
300 So. 3d 859 (La. 2020)

Opinion

No. 2019-KH-02080

08-14-2020

Vincent SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana


Writ application denied.

Johnson, C.J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

On Supervisory Writ to the 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons:

I would grant the writ to clarify that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ramos v. Louisiana , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) should be applied retroactively to cases on state collateral review. It is time we abandoned our use of Teague v. Lane , 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) in favor of a retroactivity test that takes into account the harm done by the past use of non-unanimous jury verdicts in Louisiana courts.

Regardless of the words or legal grounds a defendant uses to challenge his conviction, and for the reasons I explain further in State v. Gipson , 19-01815 (La. 06/03/20), 296 So.3d 1051, I believe Ramos should apply to anyone convicted by a non-unanimous jury.


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
Aug 14, 2020
300 So. 3d 859 (La. 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT SMITH v. STATE OF LOUISIANA

Court:Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana

Date published: Aug 14, 2020

Citations

300 So. 3d 859 (La. 2020)