From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 29, 2019
586 S.W.3d 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 81985

10-29-2019

Kenneth SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, for appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for respondent.


S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, for appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge Presiding, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam

Kenneth Smith appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after he pled guilty to sixteen offenses charged in five cases. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call mitigation witnesses at sentencing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)


Summaries of

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 29, 2019
586 S.W.3d 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Smith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 29, 2019

Citations

586 S.W.3d 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)