From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Apr 22, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19-CV-00059-RC (E.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19-CV-00059-RC

04-22-2020

WADELL SMITH JR, Plaintiff, v. CLAYTON SMITH, CITY OF CROCKETT, TX, Defendants.


**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING COMPLAINT

On April 15, 2019, pro se Plaintiff Wadell Smith Jr. ("Smith") filed this lawsuit against Defendants Clayton Smith and City of Crockett, Texas. On March 30, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn entered a report (Doc. No. 29), which recommended dismissing the complaint for failure to diligently prosecute this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Smith failed to file objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and the time for doing so has passed.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 29) is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Smith's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.

A final judgment will be entered separately.

So ORDERED and SIGNED April 22, 2020.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Apr 22, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19-CV-00059-RC (E.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:WADELL SMITH JR, Plaintiff, v. CLAYTON SMITH, CITY OF CROCKETT, TX…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 22, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19-CV-00059-RC (E.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2020)