From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Sexton

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 14, 2019
261 So. 3d 765 (La. 2019)

Opinion

No. 2018-CC-1839

01-14-2019

Kendale SMITH v. Gary S. SEXTON, Sheriff of Webster Parish, Louisiana Also Known as Webster Parish Sheriff’s Office, Deputy Carter, Deputy Sides, Deputy Couch, and Deputy Smith


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF WEBSTER

Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons:

I would grant and docket the writ application of Webster Parish Sheriff Gary Sexton, Danny Couch, John Sides and Sherry Bagwell pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 966(H). In my view, it appears the trial court incorrectly found that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to the contamination of the water to which plaintiff, as a pre-trial detainee at Bayou Dorcheat Correctional Center, was provided access. Whether plaintiff’s speculative allegation that the water was contaminated, without more, constitutes competent evidence to raise a "genuine issue" of material fact under La. C.C.P. art. 966(D) warrants further study. Such evidence is particularly troubling in that it is inconsistent with plaintiff’s prior statements that he refused to drink the water because he did not like the taste of it.


Summaries of

Smith v. Sexton

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jan 14, 2019
261 So. 3d 765 (La. 2019)
Case details for

Smith v. Sexton

Case Details

Full title:KENDALE SMITH v. GARY S. SEXTON, SHERIFF OF WEBSTER PARISH, LOUISIANA ALSO…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jan 14, 2019

Citations

261 So. 3d 765 (La. 2019)