From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Sec'y

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 8, 2023
2:21-cv-0519 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0519 WBS DB P

02-08-2023

LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 7, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 21.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 7, 2022 (ECF No. 19), are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 17) is denied.


Summaries of

Smith v. Sec'y

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 8, 2023
2:21-cv-0519 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Sec'y

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 8, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-0519 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2023)